THE Hundred of Crondal forms the north-east part of the county of Hants, and
extends on the north and east sides to the Blackwater River, which separates
Hampshire from the adjacent portions of the counties of Berkshire and Surrey.
It comprises a large tract of land extending over an area of nearly 29,000
acres, and was given to the Cathedral Church of Winchester as far back as
Anglo-Saxon days towards the support of the Bishop and monks. It was formed
previous to the Conquest into an ecclesiastical district, and placed entirely
under the supervision of the Rector of Crondal, with the exception of a small
portion on the east side, containing about 2200 acres, forming the parish of
Farnborough, which was taken out of its area and constituted a separate
parish, retaining its own tithes. The remainder of this large district had in
course of time to be provided with chapels in the outlying portions, and sub-
divided into tithings, though of late years the districts of these chapels
have obtained the designation of parishes instead of tithings. The district
forming the northern portion is called Yateley, and contains 10,036 acres; the
southernmost, Aldershot, contains 4144 acres; the western portion, Long
Sutton, contains 2267 acres; and the name of Crondal is localized to the
portion south of Yateley and west of Aldershot, and bounded by Long Sutton on
the west, containing 9614 acres. The chapelry of Yateley included the
tithings of Yateley, Hawley, Bremshete, and Southwood, as well as Minley and
Cove. The district of Crondal included the tithings of Crokeham, Swanthrop,
and Dippenhall, the manor of Itchel or tithing of Eweshot, and the Badley
estate now called Clare Park. The chapelry of Aldershot had no subdivisions,
although it contained certain exempted lands belonging to Waverley Abbey,
annexed to their grange of Tongham. The chapelry of Long Sutton had three
divisions. The most important of these was the northern half of the district
or parish, which extended along its entire length from ((Page xvi)) east and
west; and it is presumed that the shape and extent of this division led to its
distinctive appellation of Long Sutton. The southern portion consisted of two
manors: the western one ultimately acquired the name of Sutton Warblington,
owing to its having passed into the hands of the Warblington family,{1. This
was the earlier form of the surname given as Warbelton, in pp. 31, 32, 39,
425, and in p. 43. as Warblyngtone, and Warblyntone in p. 427.} although a few
years afterwards it came again into the hands of the Cathedral Priory. The
third or remaining portion was called the manor of La Welle, and was held by
military service in the 13th century by the St. Martin family, and afterwards
by the Byflete family.
The entire hundred was for the most part a vast tract of heath and gorse
lands, with portions of land here and there brought into cultivation, by the
irrigation of the Blackwater River and the favourable proximity of a number of
small streams; and another stream from Borley Hill which wended its way to a
low tract of land called La Fleet, formed the two large ponds known as the
Fleet ponds. This part of Hampshire attracted but little attention, until the
Government resolved to increase and perfect, as far as was possible, their
military forces by the formation of camps for the drilling and practising of
large bodies of troops. The wide areas of heath and common land at Aldershot,
and extending into the parishes of Crondal, Farnborough, and Yateley, were
deemed most fitting for the purpose; and 1854 the Government purchased these
large tracts of land, and established a military camp on a very extensive
scale, the camps proper being divided into two portions, distinguished as the
North Camp and the South Camp, consisting of ranges of wooden huts in parallel
lines; to the south of which permanent barracks were erected, and various
other buildings suitable for the accommodation of the troops. Besides all
this, in 1890, extensive building operations were commenced for the
construction of new barracks in the South Camp, and nearly a million and a
half of money is to be spent in new structures and in rebuilding and enlarging
the old barracks and huts. The village has since grown into a considerable
town, consisting of several streets, well paved, and lighted with gas, and has
also the accommodation of a large railway station, schools, and other public
buildings. The ((Page xvii)) other parishes of the hundred of Crondal have also
participated in the general prosperity attendant upon an increasing
population. The erection of numerous villas in the different hamlets and
tithings, as well as district Churches, has changed the appearance of the
neighbourhood in every direction, so that the outline map is intended to
indicate its past rather than its present appearance; large portions of land
marked as waste being now covered with buildings, or allotted out as building
sites, fenced in, and connected by new roads.{1. The population of Aldershot
in 1851 was 875; in 1861 it was 16720; and now, in 1891, ((*blank*)). Crondal
and its tithings in 1851 contained a population of 2431, and in 1881, 3188;
Farnborough 477, and in 1881, 3538; Yately 2156, in 1881, 3043; Long Sutton
339, in 1881, 310. The assessments were in 1851 about as follows:- Aldershot
#2195, Crondal #8319, Farnborough #3028, Yateley #2743, Long Sutton #2080, and
in 1891 they had respectively increased to #51,452; #18,196; #16,594; #21,013;
and #1972. A return made in 1882 states that the War Department owned 1205
acres of land in Aldershot, in Crondal 1165, in Cove 1167, in Farnborough 636,
and in Hawley and Minley 200 acres; and the rateable value as #16,473.}
Some early entrenchments exist on the range of chalk hills on the south
side of Crondal and Aldershot; and there is also an ancient encampment, called
Caesar's camp, upon an elevated plain, which recalls the time when the country
was occupied by the Romans. That they were quietly and peacefully settled in
the neighbourhood was proved by the discovery, in 1817, of the remains of a
large villa and a beautifully executed tessellated pavement in a field hard by
Badley pound-farm. In the year 1828, about a mile or a little more below the
range of hills, at a place on the heath not far off the line of the ancient
road from Winchester to London, was discovered a collection of Merovingian and
other gold coins, over a hundred in number, with the remains of the purse in
which they had been enclosed. These coins were either lost or deposited there
by the owner, probably a moneyer, when crossing the heath in the seventh or
eighth century.
From this early period we pass on to the records and documents contained
in the present volume. The earliest written notice of Crondal occurs in the
will of King Alfred, A.D. 880-885, and it is mentioned among the lands which
he bequeathed to Elthelm his nephew. The next document is, apparently, the
will of Bishop AElfsige, who held the See of Winchester from 951 to 958, and
contains the bequest of the reversion of Crondal to Winchester Cathedral:-
"and I grant the land at Crundele, after my life, to AElfheah, and after his
life ((Page xviii)) let it go to the Old Monastery." A few years later we have
the will of AElfheah, or Elphege, the beforementioned legatee, stating that he
gives the land at Crondal to the Old Monastery; and thus it is that the
ancient list of "The names of the founders and benefactors of the Church of
Winchester and of the monks there serving God," records that "Elphege, the
prefect, gave Crondal with its appurtenances." After this, we have in 976,
the solemn gift, or rather a royal confirmation, of Crondal to the Old
Monastery, by King Edgar, which sets out not only its extent, but also its
boundaries. The boundaries are minutely detailed, and we hoped at one time
that they would have been traced out for us, in such a manner as to enable us
to map them out; but in this we have been disappointed. The perambulation
appears to begin on the west side; but whether it included Sutton is doubtful.
It then went up by Dogmersfield and Elvetham to Hartford Bridge flats, called
Hnaef's shelf: then westward by the side of the road, and then up by Eversley
and Dudda's Brook. Thence it follows the course of the river Blackwater right
along down to Ash-bridge; thence round by Aldershot; and then south and west
by Crondal and Sutton; and so round to the starting place, called Isenhurst
gate. In 979 we have King Ethelred's grant (or rather, his charter),
restoring Long Sutton to Winchester Cathedral. It states that it was formerly
included in Crondal, and that it was to be united again to it, as one
property. The boundaries of the land are set out, though they afford little
or no assistance as regards identification of them. To a later date still are
to be assigned the few lines which describe the boundaries between Crondal and
Elvetham. The next document seems to refer to a release - a sort of quit-
claim, or extinction of some indirect or reversionary right - in order to
perfect the title of the Cathedral Monastery to the Crondal lands. It
testifies that, on Palm Sunday, 13th April, 979, one, Elnoth, came to
Winchester, and in the presence of Bishop AEthelwold placed on the altar of
the Blessed Peter, at the Old Monastery, the charter which his brother Ulric
had granted of the manor of Crondal, and that this gift or restitution of it
should remain without suit or contention unto the same holy place for ever.
Our next particulars about Crondal are derived from Domesday Book. Here
we have something more definite, ((Page xix)) as it does those precise details
which give to this well-known survey its distinctive character and value. It
states that Bishop Walkelin held Crondal for the support of the monks of his
Cathedral Church; and that Itchel and Cove, assessed at eight hides, were held
under the Bishop by the tenure, known not long afterwards, as military or
knight service; also that there was a small estate at Badley held by socage or
service tenure. Long Sutton was held by two tenants under a similar tenure to
that of Itchel and Cove. And Odin de Windsore held Farnborough in like
manner, under the Bishop, and it was assessed at three hides.
In the reign of King Edward I, AD. 1284, we have some interesting
documents which give us the particulars of the services which the Prior and
Convent of Winchester and their tenants of Crondal had to render to the Bishop
of Winchester, and the services which they owed to the Bishop's manor of
Farnham. Two years later occurs a Royal writ ordering a jury to be summoned
by the sheriff of the county, so that an Inquest might be held at Farnham,
before the King's Justices, concerning the chaces which belonged to the Bishop
of Winchester, and the chaces belonging to the Prior. The result of the
Inquest, as is set forth, states that the Bishop was entitled and that all his
predecessors were accustomed to chase in all the lands and woods of the Bishop
and his men, and in all the lands and woods of the Prior of Winchester and his
men, throughout the County of Southampton. Also, that the Prior was entitled
and that all his predecessors were accustomed to chase, in all the lands and
woods of the Prior and his men throughout the County of Southampton, excepting
the lands and woods which are in the Chace of Crondal and the appurtenant
parts of the same Chace, where the Prior is not entitled neither were his
predecessors accustomed to chase; because the aforesaid Chace of Crondal was
at one time the King's Forest, and up to the time of Bishop Peter de Roches,
formerly Bishop of Winchester, who purchased that Chace from the Lord King.
After that purchase, the aforesaid Peter and all his successors were
accustomed to chase therein; but apart from this fact the Prior or his
predecessors were accustomed to chase in it.
A series of charters and quit-claims, which have survived the wholesale
destruction of muniments in the 16th century, relating ((Page xx)) to lands in
Long Sutton and Crondal, and executed between the years 1220 and 1341, contain
many particulars of local interest. They occupy the next few pages of the
book, and are followed by a transcript of a letter of manumission, dated in
1418, in favour of John Jan, son of a bondsman of the Manor of Crondal; an
account of the knights' fees within the Manor of Crondal, commencing with the
list drawn up in 1165; and other similar returns down to the year 1316. These
lists refer to estates held independently of the Cathedral Priory, and
consequently not named in any of the court, customary, or compotus rolls
belonging to the Priory or the Cathedral Chapter. There are also various
entries of a similar character, down to the latter end of the 15th century,
and some entries of law-suits in the reign of Edward I. A few documents
occur, relating to the earlier owners of the estate now called Clare, in the
parish of Crondal, but anciently included under Badeley, as mentioned in
Domesday Book. In 1364, the Crondal tenants complained to the King that the
Prior and Convent were exacting from them additional services and customs,
which had not been demanded heretofore of their ancestors, the tenants of the
same manor. Writs of right were thereupon issued to the Prior, and to the
sheriff of the county, and a writ for the tenants to give security for the
prosecution of the suit. Finally, in 1398, we have an agreement drawn up
between the Bishop of Winchester and the Prior and Convent of the Cathedral,
as to the attendance of the Crondal tenants at the two Views of Frank-pledge,
held yearly at Blackheathfield, in Farnham.
COMPOTUS DE CRONDAL - This document commences another and distinct
section of the volume, beginning with page 51 and ending with the Sutton
Rental, page 141. It includes two plates, facsimiles, facing pp. 52 and 84.
These plates, besides showing the cramped and abbreviated writing, allow the
comparison of a small portion of the original entries with the printed text.
For this very important section, the reader is indebted solely to the Very
Reverend the Dean of Winchester, who kindly and voluntarily undertook the
irksome task of copying the originals, making the translations, and passing
the pages through the press, as well as contributing the descriptive account
of the Compotus Roll and Glossary, given ((Page xxi)) in the Appendix, pp. 505-
512. We trust, nevertheless, that the following short summary may not be
deemed intrusive.
The Prior's Compotus Roll of 1248 contains the particulars of the
receipts and expenditure of the manor of Crondal for the year ending 29th
September, 1248, classed under the headings of rents, acquittances, defaults,
and the payment of a pound of cumin seed; the sums of money received from
incidental resources, from the sale of corn, and from perquisites;
disbursements, expenses - necessary and extraordinary, and sundry payments:
the receipts and outgoings of the grange, in wheat, rye, barley, oats, beans,
peas and vetches; live stock, - cart horses, horses, colts, oxen, cows,
heifers, twinters and yearlings, calves, ewes, rams, muttons, hoggets, and
lambs; skins, wool, cheese, pigs, honey, ploughshares, hens, chicken bacon and
meat in the larder; cider, geese, and hives. All the particulars under these
headings are given with the characteristic minuteness usual in the compotus
rolls of the early part of the 13th century.
This is followed by a copy of the Compotus of the same year relating to
the Manor of Long Sutton, and the entries are of a similar character to the
Crondal account.
The next document is taken from a manuscript volume containing the
rentals and customs of the different manors belonging to Saint Swithun's
Priory, written, in the reign of Edward II, by John de Guildford, a
professional scribe. The portion printed contains the rents, services and
customs of the Manor of Crondal. It is a most interesting record, as it gives
the names of the tenants, the extent of their holdings, with the customary
services, rents payable in money and kind, and many other particulars classed
under the headings of the tithings of Crondal, Swanthrop, Yateley, Bremshot,
and Hawley, Southwood, Aldershot, Dippenhall and Crokeham. This record is
followed by a copy of the rental roll of Sutton for the year 1351 (page 135)
and it is a serviceable addition, as the estate to which it refers is the
Manor of Sutton Warblington, which had only recently come into the hands of
the Cathedral Priory. This brings us to the end of this particular section of
the book.
COURT ROLL.-A copy of the earliest existing court roll relating to the
hundred of Crondal. It gives the particulars of ((Page xxii)) the hundred
court, for the term of St. Martin, held on the 20th October, 1281, and of the
next court, for the term Hock, held on 4th April, 1282. The entries
illustrate the various sources of income accruing to the Cathedral Priory at
the holding of these half-yearly courts.
We now reach the longest and most important record, THE CRONDAL CUSTOMARY
of 1567. It was the proposed publication of this document that led to the
compilation of this collection of records relating to the Hundred and Manor of
Crondal. The existence of the Aldershot copy of the customary, a great bundle
of parchment skins covered with writing, had of late years become generally
known in the neighbourhood to those interested in topographical and parochial
matters, and it was often urged that such an important local record ought
certainly to be published; but nothing definite was done till the year 1887 or
i888, when the Rev. Charles Drummond Stooks, M.A., vicar of Yateley, took the
matter in hand, and obtained subscriptions from the principal inhabitants of
the neighbourhood, and by his zeal, kindly efforts and perseverance, a
sufficient sum was raised to pay for a transcript and translation of this
particular record. This done, an estimate was obtained of the cost of
printing the document. Fortunately, just at this time, the establishment of
the Hampshire Record Society opened a new channel for its publication, and it
was decided to allow it to form a portion of a volume containing a collection
of documents and records relating to the Hundred and Manor of Crondal. At the
same time, in order that its importance should not be diminished by its
incorporation with other documents, its contents have been given as a separate
index, (pp. 523-530).
The Customary is set forth in the indenture, executed between the Dean
and Chapter of Winchester Cathedral of the one part, and of the tenants of the
Manor of Crondal of the other part, and the particulars contained in it are
thus expressed in a brief declaration of the ancient customs of the Hundred
and Manor of Crondal:-
1. How far the hundred doth extend.
2. What customs the manor has.
3. How every yard-land, half yard-land, and farthing-land, shall be taken and known.
4. What lands the copyholder may claim by virtue of his copy.
5. By what words the grants by Copy of Court ((Page xxiii)) Roll shall pass, and what estate every copy-holder shall have thereby.
6. Who shall be heir of a tenant dying seized.
7. What land is heriotable, by whom the heriot shall be paid, and what heriot ought to be paid.
8. What person shall pay no heriot.
9. When the tenant shall pay sundry heriots.
10. What heriot the tenant by hallmote shall pay.
11. By whom the heriot due by death or surrender of a woman, being Court-baron, shall be paid.
12. Fines and heriots to be paid by the tenant in reversion.
13. A fine to be paid by every person admitted as a customary or hallmote tenant.
14. Every widow to have her widow's estate in customary or hallmote lands, and conditions thereto annexed.
15. Customary tenants, and hallmote owners, allowed to cut down coppices, hedge rows, and underwoods; and to take sufficient timber for the repair of their messuages and tenements, and for agricultural purposes,
16. For what purpose the tenant may not take wood.
17. For what purpose the lord's wood-ward shall and may fell any timber or wood upon the customary lands.
18. Where every tenant not having timber growing upon his own tenement shall have timber assigned for reparations.
19. What woods the tenants may grubb.
20. Forfeiture for felling or grubbing of woods.
21. The fine payable upon re-admission, after the said forfeiture.
22. A forfeiture for default of reparations.
23. A forfeiture for making a lease without a licence, and the lease to be void.
24. Forfeiture for impleading any tenant without licence, out of the Lord's court.
25. What fine the tenant shall pay upon the new admission after the forfeiture last recited.
26. What fine, or what surety, the tenant shall give unto the lord upon his new admission, after the forfeiture for default of reparations.
27. if any customary tenant is attainted or convicted of murder or felony, not being a felo-de-se, his lands are thereby excheated and forfeited to the lord.
28. The forfeiture of the copy-holder shall not forfeit the lands of his tenants by hallmote.
29. The lord may give, sell, or let the land forfeited for treason, or felony, with the seigniory of the tenants by hallmote, immediately upon the judgment or attainder of the felon.
30. How long the lord may take the profit of the land of his tenant outlawed.
31. How such a tenant (outlawed) shall be admitted again to his copyhold.
32. The tenant dying outlawed, his heir shall be admitted into the land forfeited by reason of the outlawry.
33. What profit the tenant may take, and what he must not take, upon the waste ground within the hundred.
34. What waste ground the lord may keep in severalty, to his own use.
35. The tenants barred by lack of claim, who shall be admitted, and what fine the tenant admitted shall pay.
36. When the infant shall be admitted, and by whom the fine shall be paid.
37. Surrenders upon condition, covenant, or marriage. ((Page xxiv))
38. The fine and heriot of a tenant for life only, upon surrender.
39 Surrender to the steward or his deputy.
40. Surrenders not taken by the steward of certain persons, void and of none effect.
41. Surrenders upon extremity of sickness, etc.
42. On surrenders made to persons who happen to die before admission.
43. To whom the custody of infants shall be committed, after the death of the ancestors.
44. To whom the infant shall be committed, if the committee die before the infant is of full age.
45, For what number of years the tenant may let his copyhold.
46. What fine is due upon such leases.
47. All other ancient customs to be maintained, provided they are not contrary to any article or agreement contained in these indentures.
48. The rights, customs, and duties of hallmote tenants.
49. Heriotable land not to be surrendered, so as to make the heriot payable upon a portion of it only.
In the schedules annexed to the Indenture or Customary, under the heading
of each tithing, are given the names of all the principal tenants and the sub-
tenants by hallmote; the extent of their holdings, the names of the different
copyholds, fields, and acreage, with the rent and other burdens therefor due.
At the end of the record, we have given in a few pages a summary of the
schedules, containing the names of all the tenants, with the amounts of yearly
rents, fines, and heriots, mentioned in the 196 pages, being the extent of the
printed text of the schedules.
The next document is a statement of the fees payable to the steward and
clerk of the lands, as agreed upon by the steward and tenants of Crondal on
9th September, 1672, with the consent of the Dean and Treasurer of Winchester
Cathedral.
THE YATELEY TITHE CASE. - A transcript of the account of a law suit tried
in 1606 in the King's Court at Westminster, with respect to disputes as to the
extent and manner of collecting the tithes, which had arisen between certain
tenants and the lessee of the tithes. It is a lengthened document somewhat
wearisome to read, owing to the many repetitions and the legal verbiage in
which it is written; yet it is full of interesting details as to the manner
and customs observed in the collection of certain tithes within the parish of
Yateley, and the payment of Easter dues and marriage fees.
We now reach the last section of the book. This division gives an
account of the manor of Itchel and Cove, a large ((Page xxv)) freehold estate,
divided into two parts, and ultimately regarded as separate manors, held of
the Bishops of Winchester by military service until the abolition of that form
of tenure by statute in 1660. In the reign of Henry III this estate came into
the hands of Walter Giffard, Bishop of Bath and Wells, and afterwards
Archbishop of York. Its proximity to Dogmersfield, the favourite resort of
the Bishops of Bath and Wells,{. The manor of Dogmersfield was granted to the
See of Bath by Henry I, and continued in the possession of the Bishops of Bath
and Wells till the year 1548. when it was alienated by the notorious Bishop
Barlow, and granted to Thomas Wriothesley, Earl of Southampton.} no doubt led
to its acquisition by Bishop Giffard, probably with the intention of adding it
to the episcopal property of the Bishoprick of Bath and Wells, or perhaps as
an endowment for a chantry. But, being shortly afterwards translated to the
Archiepiscopal See of York, he ceased to take any further interest in the
Bishoprick of Bath and Wells; and at his death the property passed into the
hands of his brother, Godfrey Giffard, Bishop of Worcester, and was afterwards
inherited by John Giffard, his nephew and heir,
In 1379 Sir John Giffard obtained permission of the Bishop of Winchester
to enlarge the park at Itchel; and, as the conditions attached to this
concession are somewhat singular, they seem to deserve a passing notice:- He
undertook for himself and his heirs or assigns, to pay and render to the said
Bishop, and to his successors the Bishops of Winchester, at their Castle of
Farnham, yearly, on the feast of St. Peter called Ad vincula (1st August), a
good bow, new, competent, comely, and sufficient, with a suitable string, and
six barbed arrows, new, competent, and sufficient, well winged with peacock
feathers; and in like manner, between the first day of December and the first
day of February, in each year, a competent fallow deer from the aforesaid
park, when the same John, his heirs or assigns, shall be reasonably called
upon to do so, by the servants of the Bishop or his successors, and the said
John, his heirs or assigns, were to capture at their own cost the aforesaid
fallow deer and send it to the Castle of Farnham, there to be delivered to the
Bishop's servants.
The Itchel estate continued in the hands of the Giffard family till the
reign of Queen Elizabeth, when it was acquired ((Page xxvi)) by Henry
Wriothesley, Earl of Southampton (who at that time was engaged in erecting a
large mansion at Dogmersfield), for the purpose of adding it to his
Dogmersfield estate. The Earl is stated to have died at the manor house of
Itchel on the 4th October, 1581, in the thirty-sixth year of his age. The
subsequent descent of the manor is briefly stated on page 468.
In the time of the Commonwealth the manor of Crondal, which included all
the parish except the tithing of Eweshot, was sold to Nicholas Love, Esq., the
eldest son of the Warden of Winchester College; but, at the Restoration, the
Dean and Chapter recovered possession of it, and it continued in their hands
until within the last few years, when it passed with the other capitular
estates into the hands of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners.
There is a large manor or tithing in the parish of Yateley, called
Minley, belonging to Mr. Bertram Woodhouse Currie, the boundaries of which are
set out from a perambulation made in 1516.{1. p473} Documents relating to the
Fleet Ponds, so well known from their contiguity to the South Western Railway,
and their covering about 110 acres of ground, are given, which show that from
the early part of the sixteenth century they were leased out by the Cathedral
authorities, from time to time. The earliest lease,{2. p451} A.D. 1505-6,
contains a clause, exacting as rent for the fishery of the ponds, a hundred of
the fishes, - pikes, tenches, perches, breams, and roaches, which were to be
caught at the costs of the lessees, and taken and delivered at Saint Swithun's
Priory, Winchester, in a good and fresh state, yearly, in the time of Lent, or
between the feasts of Easter and Pentecost. In subsequent leases a yearly
payment of 20s. for the fishery is exacted in lieu of the hundred fishes, and
this amount shows that the fish delivered must have been of large size to have
represented a similar value.
The last document given is the assessment of a lay subsidy granted to the
King James I, in 1621. It is a transcript of all the entries appertaining to
the hundred of Crondal. The total assessment amounts to #50. 10s. 4d.,
including the Liberty of Bentley,{3. Bentley Liberty contains 2288 acres of
land, and the population in 1851 was 732} which is inserted in this return
among the tithings and parishes situated within the hundred of Crondal.
((Page xxvii))
THE APPENDIX (pp. 481-512), is a valuable and useful contribution, - a
catalogue of the documents relating to Crondal manor, in the possession of the
Dean and Chapter of Winchester. For this important addition to the volume, we
are indebted to the kindness of the Dean of Winchester. Although it occupies
but a few pages, the labour bestowed upon it, and the time consumed in its
compilation and passing it through the press, must have been very great, and
the difficulty and tediousness of the work a trial of patience.
For the two indices, we are indebted to the Rev. G. W. Minns, LL.B.,
vicar of Weston, near Southampton, to whom we tender our sincere thanks for
this kindness, and all the trouble taken in their compilation; for a good
index is a very important feature in a work of this character.
F.J.B.
WINCHESTER,
26th May, 1891.